The attempt by the Democrats to woo Elon Musk following his split from Trump reveals insights into U.S. plutocracy, internal party conflicts, and the impact of billionaire money on politics.

After a very public fracture between former President Donald Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk, the Democratic Party has begun softening its stance, actively courting Musk’s favour. The development spotlights a troubling trend: the growing influence of wealth in American politics and how bipartisan power structures often prioritise plutocratic appeal over democratic integrity.

💰 A Fractured Alliance and Democratic Opportunity

Once a staunch supporter of the GOP, Musk’s alliance with Trump crumbled following Musk’s harsh critique of the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, which he labelled a “disgusting abomination”. In a public rebuke, Musk distanced himself, prompting several Democratic leaders—including Representatives Ro Khanna (D‑CA) and Ritchie Torres (D‑NY)—to advocate for re-engaging with him.

Ro Khanna insisted the party should “be in a dialogue” with Musk, noting common ground in science funding and immigration reforms.
Ritchie Torres endorsed the idea of redemption, suggesting Musk “is telling the truth” about the GOP’s massive spending.

Supporters argue this could shift Musk’s formidable wealth and influence away from Republicans, turning him into what former Trump spokesperson Anthony Scaramucci called the “prodigal son” of the Democratic Party.

⚠️ A Deep Democratic Divide

However, this courting crusade is far from unified within the party. Progressive figures like Senator Bernie Sanders and Rep. Greg Casar remain skeptical, with Sanders warning against embracing a “right‑wing extremist” whose presence risks undermining progressive values.

Meanwhile, centrists see strategic promise: Musk’s support could fracture GOP unity and bolster Democrats’ 2026 mid‑terms messaging. They argue keeping Musk politically neutral—or even on their side—could blunt his financial firepower in future elections.

🧭 The Plutocracy Paradox

This episode underscores a deeper systemic issue: U.S. democracy often dances to the tune of its wealthiest players. Musk’s nearly $300 million contribution to Trump’s 2024 campaign, and his direct role heading the Trump-era Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), illustrate how rich individuals can reshape government from the inside.

A New York Times analysis warned that Musk’s influence reflects the rise of a “Tech Right” cadre—entrepreneurs who mesh technological might with conservative politics, often sidelining grassroots voices.

🔮 What’s Next for Musk and Democracy

With Democrats debating whether to re‑embrace Musk, the broader concern endures: Money remains a decisive force in U.S. governance.

If Democrats successfully court Musk, they could derail his financial ties to Republicans and gain a strategic advantage.
Yet, losing sight of democratic principles might come at a cost—authoritarian-leaning billionaires risk steering policy agendas toward privatisation and away from public interest.
Progressives warn this could repeat past errors when political parties aligned with wealthy elites at the expense of ordinary citizens.

[This article is based on another article on Al Jazeera]