Will Russia be able to hold its breath long enough to return to Ukraine after the conflict there? Otherwise, the US would be stranded in Afghanistan forever.
 |
| [A Russian armoured troops carrying vehicle in Ukraine. Photo: EUROPEANS24] |
Hadudu Expedition is a Bengali term for the Russian military intervention in Ukraine. There can be no justification for any conflict. To make things easier to grasp, the conflict might be seen as a Hadudu game. The restoration of an opponent's borders by touching one of their players is considered a win in Hadudu. This game is not about occupying the opponent's court. If you touch someone, you're going to lose. He is stepping down from the bench. You must be able to hold your breath and return to your court, not only by touching.
Will Russia be able to hold its breath long enough to return to Ukraine after the conflict there? As a result, the United States will remain in Afghanistan as it was. United States declared wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. Russia, on the other hand, does not describe its actions as a full-scale war. A "special" operation to disarm Ukraine and remove the "Nazi mercenaries" who have taken root there, in Putin's words, is underway. So, in the Russian perspective, it is Russia's own war on terror, which is being conducted against Russia-speaking Ukrainians as well as the two breakaway entities.
However, the effort is no longer a defensive one. It has a drawstring closure and resembles a sack. Neutral reporting on the situation in Ukraine, however, is a rarity. No one should put their faith in Russian claims. Where are those European principles when the Western world has turned it into an information war, when all of the main media in the world are talking in chorus, and when Facebook has breached its own regulation and offered up a free chance to encourage hate and violence against Russia and Putin?
These people, who have become disillusioned with the United States due to piracy and violence in the nation, are turning toward Russia. In the wake of the events in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Haiti, and Panama, many people's consciences have already been tainted, making it difficult for them to react positively to the United States' declaration. Russian President Vladimir Putin has not been criticised by Western academics such as Noam Chomsky, Slavoy Zizek and John Marshmiere. Al Jazeera's Marwan Bishara and Hamid Dabashi, an American philosopher of Iranian ancestry, exemplify this mixed stance. "United for Ukraine, divided over the United States," Marwan Bishara sums it up in one word.
It's a problem in many states. Germany hasn't totally recovered from its predicament, at least not yet. German, Bulgarian, and French officials claim they cannot exist without Russian oil and gas now that the price of crude has risen to $130 per barrel. France, like Britain, is wary of making concessions to the United States. The crack in NATO is hitting people right in the face.
Furthermore, Putin has fewer nations that he is willing to talk about publicly. The Middle East has always been a friend of the United States, but this time the United States is refusing to give them any air. They're well on their way to expanding their sphere of influence abroad. It's not only Iran and Venezuela that aren't exporting oil to the United States: The price of Russian oil sanctions will rise significantly if the Saudi coalition also falls apart. There was also a trip to Saudi Arabia by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Since the end of World War II, Europe's post-war prosperity has been stretched. Discord, dissatisfaction, and instability might shake Europe if this trend continues. Aiming to remove citizens and put an additional 5-10 million migrants on Europe's economy, Putin has launched an assault on Royce.
If Russia is able to shift the weight of half a billion migrants onto the shoulders of Europe's ailing economy, it will reap the benefits of negotiating. It will retaliate for the blockage of the economy. The IMF's members are now proposing that Europe should bear the brunt of Russia's all-out embargo. Toll also goes to the dollar's monopoly on international trade as a medium of exchange. An autonomous monetary system has already been agreed upon by the countries of Russia; China; Kazakhstan; Kyrgyzstan; Belarus; and Armenia. Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea, among others, are eagerly anticipating it. We may expect open marketplaces to be established between countries. They will most likely use the Chinese yuan as their currency. Meanwhile, India continues to purchase Russian oil despite warnings from the United States. Naturally, this transaction will not take place in US dollars. Whatever the result of the conflict in Ukraine, the days of dollar monopolies are numbered. There are long-term repercussions to a conflict on European soil.
Russia hoped to use NATO's split to its advantage. But why did they assault their neighbour at this time? The midterm elections in the United States are just around the corner. As Biden has said, the United States would not send soldiers or aircraft to Ukraine.
Putin may have believed that he could take the Ukrainian stronghold in a single military campaign. Without simulated air attacks, Ukraine's military would be rendered powerless. Separating the army's distinct troops and denying them access to weapons. Ukraine, on the other hand, has opted for a more unusual approach to conflict. As a result, groups like the Azov Battalion's "Nazis" have established bases within the village itself. In addition, weapons have been made available to the general public. Mercenaries from the Middle East are also being sent into Ukraine to fight for ISIS. President Zelensky of Ukraine claims that nationality would be awarded to foreign warriors. This demonstrates that he has lost faith in NATO.
As a result, special police operations are being conducted out by surrounding the major cities, including the capital, with military assistance. They'll be tasked with tracking down the Russian soldiers' covert assailants. It's important to remember that the United States' primary military strategy is naval-centric, whereas Russia's is land-centric. Unlike in Iraq, Russia's purpose in Ukraine is not to wreck devastation. With airstrikes, they might have accomplished the same goal. However, in Ukraine, they haven't yet made as much use of the air force. For the sake of minimising civilian losses, Russia may be attempting to evict residents and conduct military operations inside the deserted city.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has unquestionably committed moral treason in his annexation of Crimea, but it is not yet time to assess his strategic impact. Finally, everything comes down to a matter of breath. Putin's forces or Zelensky's rebels will take their first breaths on the Ukrainian front. With his two-week survival against Russian attack, he has shown his mettle. Even if NATO did not show up, the number of individuals betting on him has risen significantly. A clear indication of this is the visit of the Prime Ministers of the Balkan countries to Kiev. He is now allowed to participate in negotiations between Russia and Ukraine.
The West could not let Ukraine fall. A battle with NATO was inevitable. As a consequence, World War III would ensue, which would be riddled with nuclear weapons. In the second alternative, Russia's demand for security assurances since 2006 was met. Later, Putin dubbed the eastward expansion of NATO an existential danger to Russia. America has not been informed. As recently as 2014, Russia threatened that it will topple Ukraine's elected government using US finance and intelligence. For the second time in as many months, the Russian military has been demonstrating the country's desperation to block NATO's expansion. Russia may not have posed a danger to its neighbours if the United States had committed to ensure Russia's security. After that, a safe haven would separate NATO from Russia. In the face of these battles, the globe does not suffer from humanitarian pressures.
To be deaf to Russia's requests is hardly an act of diplomacy. Because of this, the United States was not open to a diplomatic settlement. Ukraine will be used as a snare by the Pentagon instead. They aim to infuriate Ukraine and Russia at the same time. Falsified promises were made. NATO began using Ukraine as a snare. In the end, the fate of Ukraine does not concern the United States. According to the history of the Pentagon, their only objective is to sever the opponent's skull at the nape. Trickery helped them overthrow the Soviet Union and hand the renegade rule of the intoxicated Yeltsin to the Russian people. Putin and the Russian government are now the target of a new wave of anti-Putin protests in Russia. In the long run, they want to introduce Russia on Ukraine's land. As long as Zelensky remained in power, this planning was going on. It's not only weapons and mercenaries; it's also military specialists, trainers, and intelligence apparatus. According to leaked phone calls, U.S. Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland acknowledged to paying $5 billion to install Zelensky as Ukraine's president.
U.S. policy in Ukraine has been to undermine Putin's authority in Moscow, allowing large demonstrations or military coups to remove him from office. Munshiana in the United States is widely acknowledged to be an artist in these works. Russia will unleash chaos and slaughter in Ukraine if it goes to battle with the Ukrainian weapons. Ukraine has been utilised as a death trap for Russian bears, as shown by all of this. The evidence does not support Zelensky's claim that he or his compatriots are more significant to the United States.
Russia, on the other hand, has nothing to lose. If the Russians' backs become caught in the wall, they'll have to use their heavy armament. This is how a wounded superpower acts, and it's typical. As a result, they are unable to accept defeat. Because the rate is more expensive. Because of this, the West should have prevented the issue from becoming a catastrophe for anybody.
Russia overestimated its own abilities and made a big error. He's out of options. But if the United States feels they're winning, they'll make Putin's mistake, as they did. In military and economic terms, the United States is no longer the America of the 1990s. They have shifted their focus away from politics and military might. People throughout the world aren't changing their minds like they used to. Media domination, the information empire, and worldwide commerce are their main advantages.
Russia can't lose to China either. To put it simply, they will be able to have Russia on their side in this battle on their terms rather than ruining his whole global plan. In the South China Sea, the United States will no longer be able to engage with China. Since the United States is so confident in its own abilities, it is not only damaging the global economy, it is also destroying its own dollar-centric financial system. There is more at stake for the United States than Ukrainians' lives.
Ukraine, on the other hand, has no hope of winning. It is Russia's destiny if it attempts to annex Ukraine, much as that of the United States. That's something Putin is fully aware of. As a result, they need to leave soon. Russia seems to be on a mission to persuade Ukraine to stay neutral, rather than occupying the country. To put it another way, the attempt to keep Russian bears off Ukrainian ice is doomed to failure.
Not coexistence, but the will to destroy appears to be more fundamental to human society. Sigmund Freud believed that man was a language-based creature. We must decide which side is less cruel in order to survive in the middle of this. That's the worst irony of the 20th century, in my opinion.